There’s no denying the exponential growth the women’s game in England has experienced in recent years. From multi-million pound broadcasting deals to Arsenal’s Leah Williamson and Beth Mead attending Wimbledon in the Royal Box. The women’s game is finally reaping the rewards associated with regular promotion, financial backing and mass awareness. And if there was one moment in time that epitomises the explosion of English women’s football, it was last summer’s historic Euros when the Lionesses ended the nation’s 56-year wait for silverware. Yet, although the game has grown and made household names out of a select few, there is one major issue that’s continued to be highlighted along the way to ‘the top’: the extreme lack of racial diversity, both on and off the pitch.
Racial inequality is one of the biggest problems plaguing women’s football. Despite the Lionesses’ Euros win, not a single non-white player was selected to be in a Starting XI during the entire tournament. Demi Stokes, Jess Carter and Lauren James were the only players from Black or minority ethnic backgrounds to participate. Compare these worrying statistics to the men’s game where 34% of Premier League players are from ethnically diverse backgrounds, the women’s game looks abnormally homogenous. Why is this the case? A question Spotify, the London City Lionesses and She Plays Football have been attempting to address with their latest programme.
Since May, the trio have been putting on free football sessions for hundreds of girls in Barnet and surrounding North London areas with the long-term aim to have more non-white girls playing football in five to ten years. As a result, they've formed the London City Striker programme: eight brand new teams for 8-12-year-old girls, half of which will be formed by participants from the Spotify x She Plays Football community programme. With continued support, guidance and mentorship from WSL and Championship players, plus coaching from female UEFA A and B coaches, this partnership prioritises the importance of a sustainable growth model when looking to develop girls' football. In other words: they're here to make real, long-lasting and impactful change.
One of the long-term goals of the partnership is to help diversify the current academy landscape and talent pathway opportunities, in the hope of making professional English women's football more representative of wider society. “To see Black coaches and Black women who are professional players, it immediately made my daughter think: 'that’s me! I can do that too!'” Explained Keisha, mum of 10-year-old participant Ava-Rae. “It’s so important she feels and understands that, especially given she doesn’t have much representation at school or even in wider football campaigns around her. She just can’t ‘see’ herself in those spaces, but what she can ‘see’ from these sessions is, she can make it if she wants to.”
Witnessing a fully-attended training session first-hand, it’s clear to see how the programme is striking a chord with both children and parents like Keisha. The need for these sessions is clearly there, and it’s about time football recognises things need to change if the game is supposed to be for everyone, and not a few.
VERSUS sat down with London City’s Karin Muya, Charlotte Fleming and Atlanta Primus to talk about their involvement in the sessions, how impactful they think they’ve been to the local community and why they think visibility, at all levels, is vital if football’s going to really represent those who love it.
N.B. At the time of this interview all players were signed to London City Lionesses.
VERSUS: When you see so many young girls come to sessions like this, how does it make you feel?
Charlotte Fleming: I think it makes you feel proud as a woman in football to see this many young girls being brought up to love and play football. It’s also really exciting to see so many want to find a pathway and explore football outside of school. When we were younger, we didn’t have the opportunities that were available to the girls here today, and so actually, being able to coach them and hopefully inspire them – it’s a great feeling. The idea of being a role model for the younger generation, it’s something we don’t take for granted.
The fact you’ve been coaching in the local community – near to where you all play club football – does that make the whole experience even more positive?
Atlanta Primus: I think so! I think with London City being a standalone club, it gives girls in the area a local team to look out for and follow – it’s easier for them to come out and watch us play given how close we are to them. So, not only are these sessions helping to develop these girls as footballers, it’s also helping the club to reach new fans.
Karin Muya: I agree and I think in terms of accessibility, providing sessions like these really helps to bridge the gap between academies and inner-city areas. London clubs for example: Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham. Those ‘big’ clubs have academy pathways not everyone can access. So, if you’re playing football at the grassroots level – like here, today – and live in an inner-city area, you’re still able to access high quality training and see a future in the game. There are quite a few girls here who wouldn’t look out of place at an academy but can’t access them for a range of reasons. And there are quite a few girls here who aren’t quite of a certain standard to play at academy level so often get overlooked.
When we look at where these academy pathways are based too, even though they’re associated with London-based clubs, they’re quite far away.
They’re mainly in suburban areas, right?
Yeah! So, unless you have the means to travel to and from, especially during the week, they’re quite inaccessible. I think, in London’s inner-city areas, where children are more likely to be from disadvantaged backgrounds, they don’t always have access to a car or their parents and carers might not be able to commute with them to training. So there are a lot of reasons why some of these girls aren’t accessing opportunities, and we’re not seeing them filter through.
Do you think you would have loved something like this when you were younger?
AP: When I was younger, I was playing with the boys! Or I was going to camps in the summer holidays where I was still the only girl there; if I was lucky, there might have been another two or three girls in attendance. So yeah, I would have loved the chance to play with so many other girls regularly.
I think these sessions are great in helping to build confidence and helping the girls to realise there are opportunities out there for them too – not just for boys – and they can be successful in football. This is just a prime example of that and giving them the exposure and resources they need to push onto the next level, if that’s what they want to do.
Atlanta and Karin, do you both feel as if you had to leave the UK to develop and experience a better model?
AP: For me, I went to play football in America because playing football and balancing my education in the UK wasn’t really something that was feasible at the time. I felt as if I was being told: “you can play for us but only at this time, so that means we expect you to be in from this time, until this time…”
Is that something that also resonated with you Karin?
KM: Definitely. The hours we were told we needed to play just weren’t realistic if you wanted to study full-time and play football. It just couldn’t work.
AP: I was seriously thinking about going to University at the time anyway, and wasn’t really in love with the game when thinking about making that decision. So being told that just reinforced my decision to move abroad. The fact I could go overseas didn’t only mean I could get a degree, it also provided me with an opportunity to fall in love with football again. And the fact I could do both of those things at the same time and for free! It just made sense. It wasn’t an easy decision though – I am a big home bird and I love being around my family. But if I could do those four years again, I would in a heartbeat.
I was in the England youth set-up at the time too, and before I went to America I was also told: “if you go abroad we won’t be selecting you for camps anymore because we can’t afford to bring you back.”